SYLLABUS-IN-PROGRESSReligious Studies 3D03 (Fall 2005) God, Reason, and EvilThis syllabus is posted at http://socserv.mcmaster.ca/danahol/3d03 and is also accessible by way of my home page (see below) and the Dept. of Religious Studies website. It will be updated periodically, and students in the class are asked to consult it regularly during the semester. updated November 21, 2005 CLASS MEETINGS: Monday, 3:30-5:20 p.m. Togo Salmon Hall B105 Tutorial T01:
Wednesday, 4:30-5:20 p.m. Hamilton Hall 104 |
INSTRUCTOR: Dana Hollander, Department of Religious Studies, University Hall 109. (905) 525-9140, ext. 24759* danahol@mcmaster.ca* http://univmail.cis.mcmaster.ca/~danahol/ *in your phone and e-mail messages, please let me know how I can reach you by phone Office Hours: Mondays, 5:45-6:45 p.m., or by appointment. |
TEACHING ASSISTANT: Jamie Bourdon, bourdoj@mcmaster.ca, Department of Religious Studies, University Hall B124 Office Hours: Wednesdays, 2-3 p.m.
|
Course Description / Course Readings / Course Requirements | SCHEDULE: September / October / November / December
In the history of Western thought, there is an ongoing tradition of asking whether the fact of human suffering, or of evil in the world, can be compatible with the existence of a benevolent God. As Philo puts the problem in Hume's Dialogues: "Epicurus's old questions are yet unanswered. Is [God] willing to prevent evil, but not able? then is he impotent. Is he able, but not willing? then is he malevolent. Is he both able and willing? whence then is evil?" The first part of this course will look at some ways that the question of God's existence has been linked with that of the presence of suffering and evil--exploring the theme of "theodicy" in writings by Freud, Hume, and Kant. In the second part, we will turn to specifically post-Holocaust confrontations with the question of evil by looking at reports and interpretations of the Nuremberg and Eichmann trials, especially Hannah Arendt's Eichmann in Jerusalem.
A core objective of this class is to develop skills of close reading, textual analysis, and strong writing. The Text Preparation assignments are designed for you to use and improve those skills; the midterm and final exams consist of open-book essay questions that require you to apply those skills. The course is structured in a way that encourages students to approach their education as a process that both requires and rewards active engagement. Because the course presupposes that successful education requires the active, informed participation of students, the course requires participants to complete assigned readings prior to the course meeting at which they will be discussed, to attend all sessions, and to participate actively in course and tutorial meetings. Preparation for, attendance at, and participation in course and tutorial meetings are required and will count toward the final grade.
You can generally obtain these in a number of ways - see details for each title on the syllabus.
At times you may be asked to consult or make your own copy from a book on reserve.
You must have your own copy of all the texts to be discussed--with the same pagination as the edition selected for the class--whether in book or xeroxed form, so that you can mark them as you read and be prepared to refer to specific passages in class and tutorial, and when you write the exams.
In preparing these and other written assignments, you are encouraged to use the resources of the Writing Clinic at the Center for Student Development, and to consult the writing guides by Hacker and Harvey.
Grades are based on Text Preparations (10% for the first 2; 15% for the remaining 2, for a total of 25%), Attendance/Participation (20%), Midterm Exam (25%), Final Exam (30%). Failure to write either of the two examinations, or 4 unexcused absences from class, constitute sufficient grounds for earning an "F" in the class.
McMaster University has a strict policy concerning Academic Integrity: "Academic dishonesty consists of misrepresentation by deception or by other fraudulent means and can result in serious consequences, e.g., the grade of zero on an assignment, loss of credit with a notation on the transcript (notation reads: "Grade of F assigned for academic dishonesty"), and/or suspension or expulsion from the university. It is your responsibility to understand what constitutes academic dishonesty. For information on the various kinds of academic dishonesty please refer to the Academic Integrity Policy, specifically Appendix 3. The following illustrates only three forms of academic dishonesty: 1. Plagiarism, e.g., the submission of work that is not one's own or for which other credit has been obtained. 2. Improper collaboration in group work. 3. Copying or using unauthorized aids in tests and examinations."Please let me know if you have any questions on how this policy applies to your work for this course. |
You are advised to retain copies of any written work you submit for this class, and all your research notes, until you have received an official grade.
No tutorial meeting this week.
Sigmund Freud, The Future of an Illusion (1927) [book available for purchase/on reserve], I, II, III, VI, VII, VIII
Text Preparation 1 due in class September 19 from everyone. Please consult Gordon Harvey, Writing with Sources, pp. 1-5, 20 ("Abbreviated Citation for Frequently Used Sources"), and 37-38 ("In-Text Style for the Humanities"), as you are completing your assignment.
David Hume, Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion (1779) [book available for purchase/on reserve]
Text Preparation 2.1 due in class from Group 1.
Hume, Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, Part XI
Optional Text Preparation 2A due in class from those who need to make up a missed assignment.
Immanuel Kant, "On the Miscarriage of All Philosophical Trials in Theodicy" (1791), trans. George di Giovanni, in Kant, Religion and Rational Theology [essay in coursepack / book on reserve; See facsimile of German original from the Berlinische Monatsschrift here]: read to bottom of p. 26.
Text Preparation 2.2 due in class October 17 from Group 2.
Supplementary:
Kant, "On the Miscarriage of All Philosophical Trials in Theodicy," cont'd: read up to p. 33 (i.e., skip the "Concluding Remark").
Text Preparation 3.1 due in class October 24 from Group 1.
Midterm Exam Preparation Sheet distributed in class on October 24.
Thursday, October 27, 2:30 p.m. - Optional Drop-in Review Session. University Hall 103.
Andrew Altman, Arguing About Law. An Introduction to Legal Philosophy (1996): "Judgment at Nuremberg," 23-29 [2nd edition (2001) on reserve: pp. 43-49 / selection in coursepack]
Howard Ball, Prosecuting War Crimes and Genocide (1999), chap. 2: "World War II in Europe and the Nuremberg Tribunal," esp. 44-61 [book on reserve / chapter in coursepack]
Nuremberg Trial Proceedings: Charter of the International Military Tribunal (on the Avalon Project website at Yale Law School)
Lawrence Douglas, The Memory of Judgment. Making Law and History in the Trials of the Holocaust (2001), chap 2: "The Idiom of Judgment: Crimes Against Humanity" [book on reserve / selection in coursepack]
Additional Resources:
Text Preparation 3.2 due in class November 7 from Group 2.
November 14
Nuremberg and Eichmann, cont'd / ARENDT: Eichmann and Evil
"Nuremberg on Trial" (CBC Ideas, 2002) [listen online by logging on to http://audio.mcmaster.ca:8888/relst3D03; user name & password to be communicated in class and by e-mail]
Hannah Arendt, Eichmann in Jerusalem (1963) [purchase book]: chap. 1: "The House of Justice"; chap. 3: "An Expert on the Jewish Question"
Additional Resources:
Supplementary:
Text Preparation 4.1 due in class from Group 1.
Tuesday, November 15, 6:30-8:30 p.m. Screening of The Specialist (dir. Eyal Sivan, 1999), Chester New Hall B107 Additional screening times for up to 6 people in the Lyons Instructional Media Centre [sign up in class on Nov. 7]. The film will also be available for individual viewings from Monday, Nov. 14 to Friday, Nov. 18 at the Lyons Instructional Media Centre, which is open Monday to Thursday 8:00 am to 7:00 pm and Friday 8:00 am to 4:00 pm. Please plan ahead to ensure that you are able to see this film. Background Reading: Eyal Sivan, "Archive Images: Truth or Memory? The Case of Adolf Eichmann's Trial" in Experiments with Truth: Transitional Justice and the Processes of Truth and Reconciliation. Documenta 11_Platform 2, ed. Okwui Enwezor et al. (2002) [book on reserve] Eyal Sivan and Rony Brauman, Eloge de la désobéissance (1999) [includes script of The Specialist; book on reserve] |
Arendt, chap. 6: "The Final Solution: Killing" (SKIP pp. 98-105 top); chap. 7: "The Wannsee Conference, or Pontius Pilate"; chap. 15: "Judgment, Appeal, and Execution," pp. 244-52, begin reading "Epilogue"
Susan Neiman, "Theodicy in Jerusalem" in Steven Aschheim (ed.), Hannah Arendt in Jerusalem (2001) [article in coursepack / book on reserve], to p. 73.No Text Preparation due this week.
Supplementary:
Arendt: "Epilogue"; "Postscript"
"Eichmann in Jerusalem: An Exchange of Letters between Gershom Scholem and Hannah Arendt" (1963) in Arendt, The Jew as Pariah, ed. Ron Feldman (1978) [copy in coursepack / book on reserve]
Susan Neiman, "Theodicy in Jerusalem," pp. 73 bottom-end.Text Preparation 4.2 due in class from Group 2.
Supplementary
Additional Resources:
Final Exam Preparation Sheet distributed in class today.
Thursday, December 1, 5 p.m. - Optional drop-in review session. University Hall 112
December 5 - FINAL EXAM, 3:30-6:00 p.m.